Saturday, May 11, 2019

A Controversial Issue The Death with Dignity Act Essay

A Controversial Issue The Death with Dignity Act - attempt ExampleIn any case, it requires actually critical analysis before any substantive placement can be adopted. One of the fundamental issues in the Act arises turn up of the very fact that it concerns serviceman life which is deemed by many to be a sacred affair. In any case, the issues emerging out of this controversy be aboutly in support or in antipathy on the coat of the whole Act. Controversy It has to be realized that even in areas where The Death with Dignity Act is sanctioned, its natural covering still faces myriad challenges arising from the opponents of the whole ag nullifya. The Act proposes that people who are mentally fit but terminally ill should be given the option of using drugs that can hasten their closings. This should happen in cases where death appears imminent or when the uncomplaining experiences a lot of suffering courtesy of the illness. Doctors and activists are on each side of the debate o n whether the Act should be applied. Religious organizations are forging their stance on this topical issue on the strong premise that life is sacred and should never be taken for granted to the extent of hastening ones death (Or Public wellness Division, 55). While the Act grants the patients the talenty to be given the drugs to quicken their deaths, its enforcement still faces challenges as most doctors are not very at rest with prescribing such drugs to the patients who need them. In this regard, it becomes very difficult for the patients to get such operate. In the same way, most doctors are prohibited by their employers to prescribe such drugs and will therefore never offer services in this respect. While the impartiality was successfully passed in Oregon in 1994, its application still lingers given the many challenges and controversy surrounding the whole issue. In the State of Washington, the law went into effect successfully in 2009 after it was passed in 2008 without any legal challenges being raised (Hillyard, 28). The major issue presently is still the need to provide education to the masses on the whole subject of the Act in line of battle to limit much of the ongoing debate and to enable the people to fully understand how the Act operates. In this respect it would become possible to reject the law or to adopt it without much of the present controversy. As a major argument in support of this Act, it is realized that several patients normally undergo a lot of both physical and mental pain and suffering when diagnosed with terminal illnesses. In order to revive and mitigate some of these cases, it was therefore deemed appropriate in some states that the Death with Dignity Act would thereby provide the best alternative. Basically, it is a matter of individual choice and its application is based upon the fact that the patient has to be 18 years and older and be mentally sound in the process (Public Health Division, 56). Without doubt, it seem s that the Act offers patients the option of ending their lives with some level of dignity since they can genuinely decide when and where to actually die. Most opponents of this law have simply regarded it as a form of assisted suicide where a patient is lawfully given the option of taking away their life. Religious organizations especially Catholics have been very loud in opposing the law on the belief that life is very sacred and should only be taken away by God. They vehemently oppose any form of the law that might give a patient the option of deciding when to die. As such, doctors operating under such organizations are prohibited from practicing the law or referring patients to other doctors who might assist them. Most of these organizations also claim that the law might be severely abused as most people would be pressured to simply end their lives pt such a without the

No comments:

Post a Comment